Termine
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 13.04.2026, 11:00 - Mo, 13.04.2026, 12:30 | Online-Veranstaltung | Kick-Off digital |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 01.06.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 01.06.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 03.06.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 03.06.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Do, 04.06.2026, 08:15 - Do, 04.06.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 08.06.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 08.06.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 10.06.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 10.06.2026, 11:45 | C 3.121 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Do, 11.06.2026, 08:15 - Do, 11.06.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 15.06.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 15.06.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 17.06.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 17.06.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 22.06.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 22.06.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 24.06.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 24.06.2026, 11:45 | C 7.319 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 29.06.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 29.06.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 01.07.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 01.07.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Do, 02.07.2026, 08:15 - Do, 02.07.2026, 11:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mo, 06.07.2026, 12:15 - Mo, 06.07.2026, 14:45 | C 7.307 Seminarraum |
| Einzeltermin | Mi, 08.07.2026, 08:15 - Mi, 08.07.2026, 11:45 | C 3.121 Seminarraum |
Studienplankontext
Wiederholungstermin: Zu dieser Prüfung wird kein Wiederholungstermin angeboten, da sie didaktisch untrennbar mit einer der zugeordneten Lehrveranstaltungen verbunden ist. Die Wiederholung der Prüfungsleistung ist somit erst bei erneutem Modulangebot möglich.
Organisatorisches
Anmeldung
Die Anmeldung endete am 07.4.2026 um 23:59 Uhr
Personen
Inhaltliches
This seminar is a rigorous reading seminar, which is set-up as a virtual course. The detailed course plan will be discussed during the kick-off meeting on April 5th. There will be online discussion sessions as well as written assignments on reviewing other students work.
The seminar will provide the students with the scientific underpinnings of the areas of Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior. It focuses on creating and improving the understanding of how science is developing in these areas and substantial contributions are made. By reading research articles (e.g., foundational articles, intervention studies, theory based studies, newest studies in this area) students will learn how to discuss and analyze the scientific contributions, what could have done better (theoretical and methodological perspective). During the course students will elaborate and develop an own study design in a research proposal. Each student proposal will be reviewed by other students.
Students will learn how to evaluate a scientific research report and how to potentially improve these studies. Students will gain knowledge in study designs and substantial contributions to the OB and HR literature. Students will be taught how to create own study designs, write research proposals, and write reviews.
Students will improve their social competencies by critically reviewing other students’ research proposals without being offensive. Students will learn social competencies in face-to-face interactions and in written correspondence. Students will also be provided with self- and time-management skills in order to handle significant workload.
Each article will be discussed from the points of view:
1) What is its contribution? Do we agree that it is a valid contribution to the scientific literature?
2) Which W/O-Psychology practices do we understand better after reading the article?
3) What could this article have done better in terms of research design, analysis, and theoretical thinking? So these are the perspective used to discuss each article a) theory? b) methods (operationalization, scales, etc.) and statistics? c) better fit of practice and theory? d) what be done better? e) what was good in this article and what can we learn from it?
4) We want to understand what scientific model the authors used and how they attempted to contribute to science?
5) How was it written? What would the student have written differently, and would it have been better?
Students read the assigned articles and we shall determine who is going to be more on the pro-side of the article or more on the critical side (contra). The latter is supposed to be critical of theory, methodology, analysis, and conclusions of the study, the pro-person needs to defend the study as well as possible. All of us should be able to say what we can learn from each article.
At the end of the course, the students write a research proposal (max 10 double spaced pages for the body of the text) that presents an interesting research idea, its theory and methods.
Evaluation
Weitere Informationen zur Lehrevaluation: https://www.leuphana.de/lehre/qualitaetsmanagement/evaluation-feedback.html