Dates
| weekly | Wednesday | 10:15 - 11:45 | 12.10.2026 - 29.01.2027 | C 1.312 Seminarraum |
Curriculum context
Organizational information
Registration
Registration ends on 12.10.2026 at 23:59.
Persons
Content
This seminar offers a comprehensive, three-part introduction to research design in the social sciences.
Part I ("Navigating the Worlds of Science," Sessions 1–5) lays conceptual foundations: what distinguishes science from other knowledge production, key epistemological debates (positivism vs. subjectivism, qualitative vs. quantitative approaches), and different research goals (normative/positive, descriptive/explanatory/predictive). Students learn to identify and sharpen research questions, engage with theory through deduction, induction, and abduction, and move from abstract concepts to measurable operationalizations.
Part II ("Quantitative Research: From Data to Causal Claims," Sessions 6–9) focuses on causal inference. Students learn the potential outcomes framework, causal diagrams, and threats to causal claims (confounding, selection, reverse causality). Sessions progress from observational and quasi-experimental designs (difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity) through a hands-on research design workshop to experiments and the distinctions among internal, external, construct, and statistical validity.
Part III ("Qualitative Research: Making Sense of Social Worlds," Sessions 10–13) shifts to interpretive methodologies. Students explore how different epistemological frameworks construct "data" and "the field" differently (ethnography, interviews, discourse analysis), practice hands-on data collection methods (participant observation, interviews, sensory/walking methods), learn multiple coding and interpretive strategies (thematic analysis, discourse analysis, Grounded Theory), and engage with the challenges of writing, representation, and ethics in qualitative research (thick description, reflexivity, positionality).
Throughout, the pedagogy is highly interactive: students analyze published papers, critique causal claims, conduct field exercises on campus, code their own collected material, and produce analytical texts for peer review—building practical skills alongside theoretical understanding.
By the end of the lecture students will be able to:
1. Distinguish between different research goals and questions (normative/positive, descriptive/causal) and recognize which methodological approaches—quantitative or qualitative—are appropriate for each.
2. Apply core causal inference concepts (confounding, counterfactuals, causal diagrams, identification strategies) to assess whether empirical claims are credible.
3. Critically evaluate published research by identifying its underlying epistemological assumptions, data construction choices, and threats to validity or interpretive rigor.
3. Practice both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques, from identifying natural experiments to conducting participant observation and coding interview material.
4. Reflect on the researcher's position, ethical responsibilities, and the constructed nature of data and findings across different methodological traditions.
Students are expected to attend the lecture regularly and to read the required texts before each session. Sessions include short interactive exercises that only work if participants have done the reading and are ready to contribute.
Psychological research shows that the persistent use of social media lowers peoples' attention span, distracts them, overwhelms them with information without furthering their understanding, creates stress and fosters anxiety. Therefore, students are strongly advised to refrain from the use of electronic devices, including phones, tablets, and laptops, during the lecture unless these devices are needed as tools for the implementation of assigned exercises. Students are encouraged to print the assigned material and take notes by hand. Handwriting helps students to better memorize lecture contents, leading to better grades. Outsourcing essential study tasks like reading, writing, and reflection to AI reliably leads to the deskilling of students. A “Social Media & AI” folder included under the Materials tab on MyStudy contains research articles backing these claims.
For an accessible introduction to the effects of AI on human cognition and student performance please check out this interview with cognitive psychologist Christian Stöcker (in German): https://share.deutschlandradio.de/dlf-audiothek-audio-teilen.html?audio_id=dira_13D8DCDEBFFA11F17119B883034C2FA0
Evaluation
Further information on teaching evaluation: https://www.leuphana.de/en/teaching/quality-management/evaluation/course-evaluation.html